澳大利亚前维州教育部长，现任国际教育协会主席Phil Honeywood先生最近发表了一篇文章，题目是《特朗普上台将推动澳洲留学出口》，为什么这么说，我们简单看看他的分析吧！
强势的特朗普上台了，
开始驱逐1200万非法黑民，
鼓动排外情绪，
连外国留学生都已经开始受到恐吓！
特朗普计划把中国列为汇率操纵国，
对中国征收高额关税（45%），
中国全面报复美国，禁止留学生去美国留学；
同时特朗普大学因为质量太差面临破产，
打破了美国教育的神话，质量参差不齐，总统都开野鸡学校！
英国退欧，美国陷入保守主义排外情绪严重，
莫说移民，人身安全都受到威胁，
美国大学多年在国际留学市场布局功亏一篑！
那么，显而易见，最大赢家就是澳大利亚，
澳大利亚移民政策宽松，
澳大利亚留学SSVF系统简单，
澳大利亚多元文化发达，
澳大利亚各种社会保障福利最健全，
澳大利亚经济稳健就业率高，
澳大利亚和国内没啥时差方便家人联系，
澳大利亚教育质量全球领先，20%的大学世界百强，50%以上大学全球400强！
澳大利亚给每个本科和本科以上留学生2-4年工作签证，
当然，最重要的是澳大利亚最最安全！
综上所述，聪明人都知道，澳大利亚的学校必然更加受欢迎，赶快来抢位吧！
英文原文：
Australia has long referred to the US as the sleeping giant of the international education sector. Blessed with outstanding global rankings, low cost on-campus accommodation and a strong internship culture, American universities have recently been waking up to the potential to supplement declining government funding from overseas fee-paying students.
However, just as their overseas recruitment activities have started to gain momentum, Donald Trump looks set to diminish a nascent sector. Whether it be student visa approvals, post study work right options or his own problematic entanglement with the higher education sector, president Trump’s Fortress America is unlikely to act as a magnet for international student enrolments.
Last year a "media tsunami" took over the mainstream news in India. Barack Obama had announced his administration’s intention to provide six-year post-study work right visas to any international student graduating from an American university in STEM-related disciplines. With much of Silicon Valley run by Indian expatriate managers, this announcement was seen as a fast track to a green card by many Indian middle class families.
The policy was emblematic of a post-September 11 quest to open the US again to internationalisation. The fact that a Republican Party-dominated Congress and the trade union movement combined to block this socially progressive initiative was, now with the benefit of hindsight, a harbinger of things to come.
Fast forward to today and we are hearing that intolerance is surging on US campuses. TheNew York Times quoted a University of Tennessee international student as saying: "a lot of Muslim students are scared. They’re scared that Trump has empowered people who have hate and would be hostile to them".
In the same article a Latina student said she was spat on by a student wearing a Trump 2016 shirt who told her she "did not belong here any more".
Students from Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Malaysia and Indonesia have long regarded the US as their study destination of first choice. In equal measure, students from Mexico and most nations in Latin America see studying at a university in their neighbouring country as a right of passage. Many of these student source countries have not been traditionally large markets for Australian education providers. However, courtesy of Trump this may soon change.
What we also know of the president-elect’s policy agenda to date is that it is highly protectionist. Throughout the election campaign he railed against cheap Chinese imports flooding America and accused the Chinese government of deliberate currency manipulation. On US university campuses today the fastest growing cohort of international fee paying students are the Chinese. President Xi’s daughter is one of them. If Trump makes good on his promise to impose a 40 per cent tariff on all Chinese manufactured goods, one form of retaliation by China could well be the withdrawal of their students.
Perceptions that the US may no longer be safe to international students may well be enough to push students to look for alternative study destinations. One can also see a scenario in which a Trump administration might proactively clamp down on student visas being issued to certain countries. Using national security concern rhetoric and fanning a perception that foreign students may well be taking internships and job opportunities in big corporations off American born young people is not a far fetched scenario.
Trump also has mixed relationships with his nation’s higher education sector. In the lead-up to his inauguration, he has to deal with Trump University’s bankruptcy. A looming court case is likely to shed light on allegations of bad curriculum, bad teaching and recruitment practices. How this plays out for the new president’s future involvement with federal and state funding and regulation of universities could have major implications for "brand America".
It would be wrong for Australia to take for granted that our burgeoning international education industry will necessarily benefit from Fortress America’s potential woes. However, just as Theresa May and Brexit are sending out all the wrong messages regarding internationalisation of education, so too is Trump’s messaging likely to produce negative impacts for his education institutions. Australia would do well to ensure that we celebrate our cultural diversity and better communicate the extraordinary benefits of international education to the wider community.
Phil Honeywood is executive director of the International Education Association of Australia.
来源：网络
